That would be Not My Sandbox Syndrome, a label I'll ascribe here to a psychological reluctance to mess with things not of one's own creation. It came up recently in some conversations that I don't "run" much on FurryFaire. A couple scenes in sequence with very little plotline and involving only a PC or two? Sure, I do that maybe a couple times a week. Any longer continuity, any wider influence on the setting, and I pretty much skip it. Why? A lot of reasons, actually, some of which I may discuss in most depth later. Inspiration is fleeting and fickle - I can't just conjure up applicable ideas at will, but its easier to manage in this area if there are other things going on to play off of. Time can be tricky - I have had numerous scenes fall by the wayside because when I was interested in pursuing them people weren't around or something else required my attention. My GMing skills, especially online, have waned - I have enough trouble wrangling two or ...
heh... I like InDesign. I've never used InCopy, though. I hope you get caught up with minimal fuss!
ReplyDeleteInDesign seems nice and powerful. I miss the simple functionality of QuarkXpress to some degree, but meh. InCopy... has a lot of feature overlap with InDesign (and probably other Adobe programs) that we don't currently see with Word. Ultimately, though, I probably won't end up using either much. Sorta silly, but I'm in a position where I need to be able to answer (or find answers to) questions users might come up with, but I won't regularly use these programs myself.
ReplyDeleteGood luck with that! I *do* use the program, and am often answering questions for co-workers with less training than I have... and I often *still* don't know the answer. (I took a semester class in it a few years back, paid for by work... I'm so happy I did!)
ReplyDeleteYeah, i also use InDesign a lot. And I like it a lot better than Quark. Feel free to ask questions if you have any! :D
ReplyDelete